Posted  by  admin

Wsm 2019 Competitors

Wsm 2019 Competitors Rating: 3,5/5 4532 votes

2020 USACO February Contest -- Final Results

The 2020 USACO February contest featured algorithmic programming problems covering a wide range of techniques and levels of difficulty.

We love the energy and spirit you bring to the world’s biggest and best strongman competition, but we feel this is the safest decision for our fans, competitors, staff and the local community. We are working on ways to provide live behind-the-scenes access that can be enjoyed from home for the first time, so stay tuned for an exciting update. We plan to make only a minor adjustment to our $22 fair value estimate for no-moat Bed Bath & Beyond after digesting third-quarter results. Sales of $2.76 billion were modestly ahead of the $2.7.

A total of 5799 distinct users logged into the contest during its 4-day span. A total of 4976 participants submitted at least one solution, hailing from 76 different countries:

  • I compete regularly in Smallbore Prone competition. I am by NO means a top level competitor. However, shooting on the 100 yard NRA target with its 1' X ring and 2' 10 ring, it is not uncommon for me to score 400 / 25 35 X, nor is it uncommon for my fellow competitors to do so as well. Anschutz 1413 and Lapua Center X or Midas + ammo.
  • The 7-300 WSM has slightly different chamber dimensions than a 7 WSM. Robert Whitley explains, “The difference is that the 7mm/300WSM has a.038″ shorter head space and a.038″ longer neck than a factory 7mm WSM, and you need to make brass for the 7mm/300 WSM from 300 WSM or 270 WSM cases.” (Read more here).
  • The 2019-2020 season is winding down - just one more contest to go before we name our next set of finalists. I'm quite happy that this contest ran quite smoothly, particularly since it was the first being run on a new server. Performance as a whole was quite impressive despite challenging problems at all levels of the contest.
In total, there were 13498 graded submissions, broken down by language as follows:

Below are the detailed results for each of the platinum, gold, silver, and bronze contests.You will also find solutions and test data for each problem, and by clicking on anyproblem you can practice re-submitting solutions in 'analysis mode'. If you arelogged in, you will also see your own specific results below alongside the contest(s)you took.

USACO 2020 February Contest, Platinum

The platinum division had 523 total participants, of whom 366 were pre-college students. Results for top scorers are here. Congratulations to all of the top participants for their excellent results!

Delegation
View problem Test data Solution
Equilateral Triangles
View problem Test data Solution
Help Yourself
View problem Test data Solution

USACO 2020 February Contest, Gold

The gold division had 723 total participants, of whom 560 were pre-college students. All competitors who scored 800 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the platinum division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here.

Timeline
View problem Test data Solution
Help Yourself
View problem Test data Solution
Delegation
View problem Test data Solution

USACO 2020 February Contest, Silver

The silver division had 2311 total participants, of whom 1822 were pre-college students. All competitors who scored 700 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the gold division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here.

Swapity Swapity Swap
View problem Test data Solution
Triangles
View problem Test data Solution
Clock Tree
View problem Test data Solution

USACO 2020 February Contest, Bronze

The bronze division had 2992 total participants, of whom 2239 were pre-college students. All competitors who scored 700 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the silver division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here.

Triangles
View problem Test data Solution
Mad Scientist
View problem Test data Solution
Swapity Swap
View problem Test data Solution

Final Remarks

The 2019-2020 season is winding down --- just one more contest togo before we name our next set of finalists. I'm quite happy thatthis contest ran quite smoothly, particularly since it was the firstbeing run on a new server. Performance as a whole was quiteimpressive despite challenging problems at all levels of the contest.

I would remind our competitors that creation of duplicate accounts andother forms of abuse of the contest system (which unfortunately seemto be on rise, especially from overseas) are not tolerated and willresult in lifetime disqualification from USACO participation (sortingout these issues is perhaps also the primary reason slowing downgeneration of contest results).

For those not yet promoted,remember that the more practice you get, the betteryour algorithmic coding skills will become -- please keep at it! USACO contests are designed to challenge even the verybest students, and it can take a good deal of hard workto excel at them. To help you fix any bugs in your code, youcan now re-submit your solutions and get feedback from thejudging server using 'analysis mode'.

A large number of people contribute towards the qualityand success of USACO contests. Those who helped with thiscontest include Mark Gordon, Benjamin Qi, Jonathan Paulson, Spencer Compton, Travis Hance, Dhruv Rohatgi, and Nick Wu.Thanksalso to our translators and to Clemson CCIT for providing our contest infrastructure. Finally, we are grateful to the USACO sponsors for their generous support: TwoSigma, D.E. Shaw, and Ansatz Trading.

We look forward to seeing everyone again for the US Open contest, our national championship.

Happy coding!

- Brian Dean (bcdean@clemson.edu)
Director, USACO


Wsm 2019 Competitors 2020

2019 December Contest -- Final Results

The 2019 December contest featured algorithmic programming problems covering a wide range of techniques and levels of difficulty.

A total of 7698 distinct users logged into the contest during its 4-day span. A total of 6545 participants (a substantial jump fromlast year!) submitted at least one solution, hailing from 76 different countries:

In total, there were 20319 graded submissions, broken down by language as follows:

Below are the detailed results for each of the platinum, gold, silver, and bronze contests.You will also find solutions and test data for each problem, and by clicking on anyproblem you can practice re-submitting solutions in 'analysis mode'. If you arelogged in, you will also see your own specific results below alongside the contest(s)you took.

USACO 2019 December Contest, Platinum

The platinum division had 493 total participants, of whom 317 were pre-college students. Results for top scorers are here. Congratulations to all of these high-scoring participants for their excellent results!

Greedy Pie Eaters
View problem Test data Solution
Bessie's Snow Cow
View problem Test data Solution
Wsm 2019 Competitors
Tree Depth
View problem Test data Solution

USACO 2019 December Contest, Gold

The gold division had 900 total participants, of whom 694 were pre-college students. All competitors who scored 800 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the platinum division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here.

Milk Pumping
View problem Test data Solution
Milk Visits
View problem Test data Solution
Moortal Cowmbat
View problem Test data Solution

USACO 2019 December Contest, Silver

The silver division had 2299 total participants, of whom 1715 were pre-college students. All competitors who scored 650 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the gold division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here.

MooBuzz
View problem Test data Solution
Meetings
View problem Test data Solution
Milk Visits
View problem Test data Solution

USACO 2019 December Contest, Bronze

The bronze division had 5831 total participants, of whom 4442 were pre-college students. All competitors who scored 800 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the silver division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here.

Cow Gymnastics
View problem Test data Solution
Where Am I?
View problem Test data Solution
Livestock Lineup
View problem Test data Solution

Final Remarks

What an awesome start to the season! Our participation numbers jumped by a substantial amount from last year,which is great to see. As is typical for the first contest of the season, we saw a large number of promotionsacross all divisions.

Wsm 2019 Competitors Review

For those not yet promoted,remember that the more practice you get, the betteryour algorithmic coding skills will become -- please keep at it! USACO contests are designed to challenge even the verybest students, and it can take a good deal of hard workto excel at them. To help you fix any bugs in your code, youcan now re-submit your solutions and get feedback from thejudging server using 'analysis mode'.

Many people contribute towards the qualityand success of USACO contests. Those who helped with thiscontest include Benjamin Qi, Spencer Compton, Mark Gordon, Nick Wu, Eric Wei, Dhruv Rohatgi, Michael Cao, and Yinzhan Xu.Thanksalso to our translators and to Clemson CCIT for providing our contest infrastructure. Finally, we are grateful to the USACO sponsors for their generous support: TwoSigma, D.E. Shaw, and Ansatz Trading.

We look forward to seeing everyone again for the 2020 January contest.

Happy coding!

Wsm 2019 Competitors Vs

- Brian Dean (bcdean@clemson.edu)
Professor of Computer Science, Clemson University
Director, USACO

Wsm Competitors Who Have Died